LARRY MEINSTEIN, JUNE MEINSTEIN, PARMAN FLORIDA, INC., AND PROTEAN INVESTORS, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
TRAVEL ETC., INC., APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Civil Procedure 1.610 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee’s Motion for Rehearing, we withdraw the opinion of November 1, 1983, and substitute the following opinion.
We reverse the trial court’s order permitting appellee to hold over as tenant until sixty days after determination of the action upon a holding that the order appealed provided injunctive relief, see Florida Jurisprudence, Injunctions, section 32 (1981) and cases cited therein, requiring the trial court to apply Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610. While the equitable remedy is proper in this case, see Shaw Brothers Oil Co. v. Parrish, 99 So. 2d 610 (Fla.1958); Knight v. Global Contact Lens, 220 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); 43A C.J.S. Injunctions § 66 (1978), we reverse because the trial court failed to require the posting of bond, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c), and because the order fails to specify the court’s reasons for entering the order, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ballance v. State, 447 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…as a probation condition under Section 948.03, we perceive no valid reason why we should not construe that section to accord aggrieved party status to a private entity such as Occidental under the circumstances of this case. Compare Purvis v. State, 442 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1983). We must however, reverse that portion of the trial court’s order requiring the defendant to comply with a payment schedule to be formulated by the probation officer based upon the latter’s future determination of the defendant’…
-
Hutchinson v. Kimzay OF Fla., Inc., 637 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…ain the status quo pending a decision on the merits. Since the 18 December order was an injunction in a lease case, it must be examined to see if it meets the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610. See Meinstein v. Travel Etc., Inc., 442 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The order must be dissolved because the trial judge did not state reasons for his decision and did not require that a bond be posted. The trial judge could not state reasons because there were no affidavits, verified pleadings,…
-
Pollock v. Honorable Fred L. Bryson, 450 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…347 So. 2d 1021, 1022 (Fla.1977) (stating general rule); Goodson v. State, 400 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (stating failure to object generally constitutes a waiver). See §§ 775.089(1) and 948.03(1)(g), Fla. Stat. (1981). Accord, Purvis v. State, 442 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). However, the trial court in the present case, unlike the trial courts in the above-cited cases, did not sua sponte or at the sole insistence of the state impose or require the excess restitution to be paid as a condition of proba…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Knight v. Global Contact Lens, Inc., 220 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Shaw Bros. OIL Co. v. Parrish, 99 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1958)