S. N. JACOBI, APPELLANT,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment.
Plaintiff, a sales representative for IBM, sued to dispute the construction of his compensation contract for commissions in 1963 and 1964. The defenda…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Contract Interpretation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The defendant, International Business Machines Corporation, is engaged in the business of leasing sophisticated data processing equipment and, for the purpose of negotiating, servicing and conserving such leases, employed Jacobi, the plaintiff, as one of its territorial sales representatives. Plaintiff’s compensasion was governed by the provisions of a written Sales Compensation Plan contract. The present controversy involves the construction of the Compensation Plan Contract as it applies to the plaintiff’s commission compensation for the years 1963 and 1964. Based upon the record, including the pleadings and depositions taken, the defendant moved for summary judgment which motion was granted. The plaintiff has appealed.
The district court filed a comprehensive written opinion stating the reasons in support of the grant of summary judgment. We have carefully examined the record and we find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the opinion of the district court.1
Affirmed.
. Jacobi v. International Business Machines Corp., 277 F.Supp. 709 (D.S.C.1967).