MIGUEL ANGULO SALAZAR, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that statements made by a coconspirator to an undercover agent, indicating the source of supply was packaging drugs inside, were admissible as they were made in furtherance of the conspiracy.
Defendant Salazar appealed a conviction for violating 21 U.S.C. § 174. The appeal concerned the admission of testimony about statements made by Salaza…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Co-Conspirator Exception To Hearsay Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Defendant Salazar appeals from a judgment of conviction of a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174.
The sole contention on appeal is that the Court prejudicially erred in admitting over his hearsay objection testimony about statements made by appellant’s coconspirator, Sesma, to the witness Saiz, a government undercover agent, because the declarations were not in furtherance of the conspiracy. The statements were a part of a conversation between Sesma and Saiz, which took place outside Sesma’s house when Saiz came there to receive delivery of a large quantity of heroin. Appellant challenges that part of the conversation in which Sesma told Saiz that Sesma’s source of supply was presently in the house packaging and preparing the heroin. Those statements, he argues, did not further the sale of the contraband, but were merely narrative remarks of Sesma, indirectly identifying the appellant. We disagree.
The District Court could have properly concluded that the statements furthered the conspiracy because Sesma made them to prevent Saiz from leaving before the sale was concluded. Sesma had failed to meet the delivery date originally set for the shipment, and he had reason to believe that his big customer would be suspicious about further delay. Saiz exhibited restlessness. After the statements were made, Saiz waited briefly, then knocked at the door. When Sesma answered, Saiz told him that he was tired of waiting. Sesma then admitted Saiz to the house, and Saiz saw the appellant in the dining room sifting heroin.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976)
-
United States v. Overshon, 494 F.2d 894 (8th Cir. 1974)
-
United States v. Susanne M. Hutchinson, 488 F.2d 484 (8th Cir. 1973)
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence