ROBERT R. GEHLER
v.
PAUL E. M. IASIGI, APPELLANT
ROBERT R. GEHLER
PAUL E. M. IASIGI, APPELLANT
407 F.2d 448
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Defendant has argued pro se his appeal from a judgment in the amount of $1,143.24 and an attorney’s fee of $225.00 for services rendered to him by the plaintiff as a bookkeeper and tax analyst.
The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court in a comprehensive opinion which makes it clear that the case involved questions of fact which the Municipal Court resolved in favor of the plaintiff, a conclusion which it could not say was clearly erroneous. 6 V.I. 352.
We agree and therefore will affirm the judgment of the District Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Johnson, 577 F.2d 1304 (5th Cir. 1978)
-
United States v. Daly, 481 F.2d 28 (8th Cir. 1973)
-
United States v. Goetz, 746 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1984)
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence