LAWRENCE JUSTICE, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the conviction for attempted robbery was supported by adequate evidence and that the trial judge's conduct did not prejudice the defendant.
The defendant was convicted of attempted robbery of a national bank office, a violent event involving gunfire. The defendant presented an alibi, and a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prejudicial Conduct cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from a conviction of attempted robbery of a national bank office in the Los Angeles area. The event was a violent one with gunfire.
There can be little doubt that there was adequate evidence to sustain beyond a reasonable doubt the conviction. Justice had an alibi which he related on the stand. It was possible, but even on paper sounds improbable.
Here it is asserted that the trial judge was irascible and it prejudiced the defendant. His impatience was equally directed at government and defense counsel. He himself repeatedly cautioned the jury that his remarks constituted no preference as to sides. And, there was reason for some of the impatience.
Questioning of the jury was somewhat limited, but we find it within the sound discretion of the judge.
We find the charge of trial counsel’s inadequacy without merit.
As to alleged erroneous admission of evidence, we find that whatever shortage there was of direct testimony for foundations was clearly taken care of by circumstantial evidence.
A government witness was permitted to remain in court over defense objections. Under the facts here, the ruling was in the exercise of a sound discretion.
Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of conviction.