EDWARD SERZYSKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-APPELLEE,

v.

THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

2d Cir. | 1969-05-20

Nos. 531, 532, Dockets 33096, 33097

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WYATT, District Judge

409 F.2d 1360 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1969) Positive Treatment

Cited by 28 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.:

We affirm in all respects the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the thorough and well reasoned opinion of Judge Graven reported at 290 F.Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1968).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

Graham K. Hinnant v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. OF FT. Lauderdale, 406 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, 429 F.2d 1136 (2d Cir. 1970)
Mallis v. Bankers Tr. Co., 615 F.2d 68 (2d Cir. 1980)

Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

EDWARD SERZYSKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-APPELLEE, v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

EDWARD SERZYSKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-APPELLEE,

v.

THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT