IRA LEE POWELL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• McCARTHY v. State, 446 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …tructions to the jury for consideration during deliberation. Although we previously have expressed our concern about the problems attendant upon this practice, we have declined to reverse where no prejudice has been shown to result. Powell v. State, 443 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fayson v. State, 442 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); DeWitt v. State, 442 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). In a more recent case, Woodring v. State, 448 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), we reversed when the trial judge, upon t…
• Crawley v. State, 455 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See McCarthy v. State, 446 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Powell v. State, 443 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fayson v. State, 442 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Dewitt v. State, 442 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Cf. Woodring v. State, 448 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). COBB, C.J., and DAUKSCH and CO-WART, JJ., concur.…
• Draves v. State, 459 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …four separate cases that while sending the jury tape recorded instructions is a practice to be discouraged, it is not reversible error in the absence of a showing of prejudice. McCarthy v. State, 446 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Powell v. State, 443 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fayson v. State, 442 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); DeWitt v. State, 442 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). This appellant has made no showing of prejudice. Second, the appellant argues that his concurrent sentences of five yea…

Authorities Cited

• Wallace v. Sears, 442 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
• Dewitt v. State, 442 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)