UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
GREGORIO VICTOR VILLAHERMOSA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
GREGORIO VICTOR VILLAHERMOSA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
411 F.2d 599
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Defendant’s sole point on appeal from his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 173 is that the trial court improperly permitted the use of evidence of defendant’s prior convictions for impeachment. Defendant relies upon the line of cases following Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App. D.C. 151, 348 F. 2d 763 (1965). Since no objection was made to the evidence, its use was not reversible error. Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 365 F. 2d 949, 951 (1966).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Black v. Keystone Steel Fabrication, Inc., 584 F.2d 946 (10th Cir. 1978)
-
Fiedler v. Marumsco Christian Sch., 631 F.2d 1144 (4th Cir. 1980)
-
United States v. Pitts, 508 F.2d 1237 (8th Cir. 1974)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Luck v. United States, 348 F.2d 763 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
- Hood v. United States, 365 F.2d 949 (D.C. Cir. 1966)