FRANCIS DELAURIER AND DONALD WIEBER, APPELLANTS,
v.
SCHOOL BOARD OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-01-17
Nos. 83-1028, 83-1029
Before HENDRY, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ,
443 So. 2d 1067 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The orders of the appellee, the School Board of Dade County, Florida, dismissing the appellants from their employment with the Board are affirmed. The Board was free to reject the hearing officer’s conclusions of law, see Alles v. Department of Professional Regulation, Construction Industry Licensing Board, 423 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), that the appellants’ actions did not constitute immorality and misconduct in office where the hearing officer’s findings of fact clearly supported contrary conclusions. See Adams v. State Professional Practices Council, 406 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Tomerlin v. Dade County School Board, 318 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Andres Bustillo, M.D. v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 561 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …fficer’s conclusion of law to the contrary. See, e.g., Public Employee Relations Comm’n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass’n, 467 So. 2d 987 (Fla.1985); MacPherson v. School Board, 505 So. 2d 682, 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); DeLaurier v. School Board, 443 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Dr. Bustillo also objects to a provision in the final order which states: Respondent shall appear before the Board at their first meeting after rendition of this Order, and semi-annually thereafter during the term of this Order…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw