HAROLD GROSSNICKLE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
HAROLD GROSSNICKLE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
STATE OF ALABAMA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
415 F.2d 864
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*865] PER CURIAM.
It is ordered that the motion filed by appellee to dismiss the appeal, in the above styled and numbered cause, is hereby granted.
At most, this appeal questions the method of determination used and the result reached thereby by Alabama prison authorities and Alabama courts in computing the time to be served by petitioner under an Alabama state sentence. We must leave such decisions to the courts of Alabama. They present no federal question, constitutional or otherwise, and are not subject to review by federal ha-beas corpus proceedings. Cf. United States ex rel. Kennedy v. Tyler, 269 U.S. 13, 46 S.Ct. 1, 70 L.Ed. 138 (1925); Young v. Eidson, 8 Cir. 1954, 217 F. 2d 158.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Keenan v. Bennett, 613 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1980)
-
Holtzinger v. Estelle, 488 F.2d 517 (5th Cir. 1974)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Tyler, 269 U.S. 13 (U.S. 1925)
- Young v. Eidson, 217 F.2d 158 (8th Cir. 1954)