THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
KENNETH L. THOMPSON, APPELLEE
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
KENNETH L. THOMPSON, APPELLEE
444 So. 2d 542
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 60 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Major v. State, 389 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 408 So. 2d 1096 (Fla.1981); State v. Carney, 423 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Luxenburg v. State, 384 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Moorehead v. State, 378 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Rose v. State, 369 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (30 total)
-
Hardwick v. State, 521 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 1988)…ent upon the court to determine whether the accused is knowingly and intelligently waiving his right to court-appointed counsel, and the court commits reversible error if it fails to do so. Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835, 95 S.Ct. at 2541; Smith v. State, 444 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). This particularly is true where, as here, the accused indicates that his actual desire is to obtain different court-appointed counsel, which is not his constitutional right. Donald v. State, 166 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). T…
-
Johnston v. State, 497 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 1986)…nd Johnston continued to assert his right to self-representation. A trial court is obligated to examine the reasons given by a defendant to support his motion to discharge counsel and the grounds behind counsel’s motion to withdraw. Smith v. State, 444 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The trial court examined the reasons underlying the defendant’s motion and properly concluded that they were insufficient. As the trial court explained to Johnston, counsel did not invade his right to privacy because Johnston’s…
-
Kearse v. State, 605 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…es. Id. at 835, 95 S.Ct. at 2541, 45 L.Ed.2d at 581-82. A defendant may choose to proceed without an attorney either by directly requesting same for good reason or by persistent demand for same in the absence of a sufficient reason. Smith v. State, 444 So. 2d 542, 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (persistent demand that court-appointed counsel be discharged, even though court determined there was an insufficient reason to do so, is tantamount to a request to represent oneself). Under either circumstance, the trial co…
Previewing 3 of 30 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Major v. State, 389 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Rose v. State, 369 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- Luxenburg v. State, 384 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
- Abbass Khonsary v. Picciolo, 423 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Moorehead v. State, 378 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)