ANTONIO VEITIA BARBERIA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-01-31
No. 83-553
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
444 So. 2d 568 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Woods v. State, 426 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Stewart v. State, 221 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Brodie, 602 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
    …ed. Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co.. Although the practice of periodic billing in the regular course of dealing may establish an account stated if no objection to the amount of the bill is made within a reasonable time, Levy v. Stephen L. Geller, Inc., 444 So. 2d 568 (Fla.3d DCA1984), no such practice was established in the record before us. “In an action for an account stated, failure to respond to a demand, without more, would not establish liability.” Page Avjet Corp. v. Cosgrove Aircraft Serv., 546 So. 2d 16…
  • Emilio Mila v. Chiossi, 664 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Levy v. Stephen L. Geller, Inc., 444 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Dudas v. Dade County, 385 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw