HORACIO ALVAREZ, APPELLANT,

v.

SHARON HOTEL AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICES, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Earnese Davis v. Broward Cnty. Health Dep't, 570 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …s well established that an order must set forth the findings of fact or conclusions of law that support the imposition of penalties. See United General Construction v. Cason, 522 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Mulkerrin, 444 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Stardust Motel v. St. Claire, 418 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, for the reasons heretofore stated, those portions of the JCC’s order denying wage loss benefits after MMI and assessing penalties against the e/c a…
• Jupiter Marine & Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Spoelstra, 528 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …, we held that the deputy commissioner has the same obligation to state the ultimate facts and conclusions supporting the imposition of a penalty as he has in regard to any other award of benefits. See also, Florida Power and Light Co. v. Mulkerrin, 444 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the deputy commissioner to make appropriate findings and conclusions with regard to the above. We have examined the other issues raised by the appellants and find them to be without merit…
• Cuccarollo v. Gulf Coast Bldg. Contractors & U.S.F. & G., 500 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …claimant had sustained permanent impairment was error. Neither party argues that such issue was not ripe for determination. The case, then, should be remanded to the deputy to make this essential finding, cf. Florida Power & Light Co. v. Mulkerrin, 444 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) — unless, of course, the error can be deemed only harmless in light of the deputy’s explicit ruling on the issue now on review. The deputy’s determination that no causal connection existed between the wage-loss suffered and clai…

Authorities Cited

• Fred v. Sasso, 431 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)