NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
LEVITZ FURNITURE CO., INC., RESPONDENT

5th Cir. | 1969-12-04
No. 27833
418 F.2d 1093 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1969)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted the National Labor Relations Board's petition for enforcement of its order against Levitz Furniture Company.


Facts & Procedural History

The National Labor Relations Board issued an order against Levitz Furniture Company for refusing to bargain with a certified union. The Company subseq…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F. 2d 526 Part I.

This case is before the Court upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10 (e) of the National Labor Relations Act, for enforcement of its order, issued against Levitz Furniture Company, Inc., of Miami, on June 31, 1968. The Board found that the Company violated Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to bargain with the Freight Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 390. This was the Union which had been certified by the Board.

The Company has chosen not to file briefs in this court and has decided to comply with the order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board is unwilling to dismiss its petition for enforcement, due to some mechanical problems and the lapse of time involved in the Company’s complying with the order. A review of the record reveals that enforcement of the order should be granted.

Enforced.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw