DAVID LAWRENCE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1969-11-24
No. 26767
419 F.2d 1326 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This appeal, filed sixty three days after the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, is dismissed.1 See Allen v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 384 F. 2d 745. There is no showing that the failure ,to file the notice of appeal within the extended time period of 30 days provided under Rule 4(a), Federal Rules Appellate Procedure, was attributable to anyone other than appellant. We thus deem the case of Fallen v. United States, 1964, 378 U.S. 139, 84 S.Ct. 1689, 12 L.Ed.2d 760, to be inapplicable.

As ,to appellant’s right to file an additional petition for writ on the same or other grounds in the District Court, see Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Appeal dismissed.

. This appeal was dismissed by order of this court dated September 25, 1968. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 401 F. 2d 177. That order was vacated on November 20, 1968. The court then ordered that the motion be carried with the ease for disposition. Council was appointed to represent appellant. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 404 F. 2d 614.

Other
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw