PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
CONTINENTAL NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Pan Am appeals a summary judgment in favor of Continental National Bank concerning eight miscellaneous charge orders (MCOs) worth over $82,000 that were issued by defunct travel agents and deposited by Roadway International at Continental Bank. Pan Am sought recovery based on breach of warranty under Florida's UCC provisions, but the court affirmed the summary judgment, holding that the warranty of good title does not extend to unauthorized agents.
The warranty of good title under § 674.207(1) is limited to ensuring no forged endorsements and does not extend to impose liability on a bank for items issued by unauthorized agents. Since Pan Am did not allege that Roadway's endorsement was forged and the named payee received the proceeds, Pan Am's warranty claim fails as a matter of law.
[1] A bank's warranty of good title under section 674.207(1), Florida Statutes, is limited to the absence of forged endorsements and does not extend to impose liability on th…
[2] A claim for breach of warranty of good title against a collecting bank fails as a matter of law when the payee did not forge the endorsement and the named payee received…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The warranty of good title found in section 674.207(1) is limited to a finding that the item was presented for payment with no forged endorsements”
Establishes the narrow scope of the warranty of good title under Florida's UCC
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePan Am, as a member of the Air Transport Association, appointed travel agents who were provided with MCOs—forms that could be issued for services othe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Forged Endorsement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Pan Am is a member of the Air Transport Association of America, one of whose functions is to appoint travel agents for its member carriers and to provide these travel agents with printed forms for flight tickets and other documents connected with air travel and related services. In this regard, travel agents are given miscellaneous charge orders (MCO’s) which may be issued by them for services other than air transportation and are drawn on a member airline by embossing the carrier’s and travel agent’s validating plates.
Eight MCO’s bearing the proper validating plates were issued by defunct travel agents and delivered to Roadway International. That company deposited them in its account at Continental Bank. The bank initiated the collection process against Pan Am. Proceeds in excess of $82,000 were paid by Pan Am to the account of Roadway even though the airline had previously been notified of the cancellation of the agencies. The instant suit by Pan Am against Roadway and Continental Bank seeks the return of those sums. As to Continental, Pan Am asserted a breach of warranty under sections 674.207(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (1981), and fraudulent misrepresentation as to the warranties. Pan Am appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Continental Bank. We affirm.
The warranty of good title found in section 674.207(1) is limited to a finding that the item was presented for payment with no forged endorsements, § 674.207, Fla.Stat. (1981); Sun ’N Sand, Inc. v. United California Bank, 21 Cal.3d 671, 582 P. 2d 920, 930, 148 Cal.Rptr. 329, 339 (1978); Union Bank of Benton, Arkansas v. First National Bank in Mt. Pleasant, Texas, 621 F. 2d 790 (5th Cir.1980); and, contrary to Pan Am’s contention, does not extend to impose liability on a bank where the item is issued by an unauthorized agent. Since, in the present ease, Pan Am does not maintain that anyone has forged the endorsement of the payee, Roadway,1 and it is admitted that the named payee did receive the proceeds of Pan Am’s payment on the item, we agree with the trial court that the appellant’s claim must fail as a matter of law.
Finding no merit in the other points on appeal, we affirm the summary judgment in favor of Continental Bank.
. In fact, there is no endorsement by Roadway.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- The Union Bank OF Benton v. The First Nat'l Bank IN MT. Pleasant, 621 F.2d 790 (5th Cir. 1980)