PATRICIA J. PRUETT, APPELLANT,
v.
GLORIA BROWNING AND RICHARD BROWNING, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fraudulent Conveyance cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The final judgment under review setting aside a fraudulent conveyance is affirmed as there was substantial, competent evidence adduced at trial to establish that the said conveyance was entirely fraudulent as to the plaintiff tort creditor. No consideration or agreement for consideration was given at the time of the conveyance and the subsequent bizarre financial transactions between the parties make no reference to the prior, already accomplished conveyance. Abundant evidence was also ad duced to show that the latter transactions were a sham and that crucial portions of the defendants’ testimony to the contrary were not worthy of belief. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Reinhart v. Reinhart, 291 So. 2d 103, 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Gyorok v. Davis, 183 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
- Guerrero v. State, 291 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Eugenia A. Gyorok v. Davis, 183 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)