AMBRY D. ALLEN, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
LEROY STYNCHCOMBE, SHERIFF, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1970-02-09
No. 28297
421 F.2d 1399 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the district court did not err in denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus without an evidentiary hearing.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought habeas corpus relief, claiming his guilty plea was induced by promises from a deceased prosecutor. State courts had previously denied…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus without an evidentiary hearing. The contention is that a plea of guilty was induced by the promises of a deceased state prosecutor. Collateral relief has been twice sought, without success, in the state courts on the same ground. Allen v. Caldwell, 1968, 224 Ga. 47, 159 S.E. 2d 289; Allen v. State, 1968, 118 Ga.App. 354,163 S.E. 2d 839.

The district court here concluded that the records made in the state courts were such as not to require a further ev-identiary hearing in the federal habeas court. The court then made its own conclusions of law, based on the state records, that appellant had been afforded full and fair hearings in the state court, that the state court factual findings were amply supported, and that the plea of guilty was entered voluntarily.

The procedure followed by the district court was precisely that taught in Townsend v. Sain, 1963, 372 U.S. 293, 312-314, 318, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770. See also 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, as amended November 2, 1966. The district court did not err in the procedure used nor do we find error in the result reached.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw