FRANKLIN JAMES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-02-14
No. 83-78
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and BASKIN, JJ.
445 So. 2d 1 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 31 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maggard v. State, 399 So. 2d 973 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1059, 102 S.Ct. 610, 70 L.Ed.2d 598 (1981); A. McD. v. State, 422 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Ho Yin Wong v. State, 359 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 886 (Fla.1978).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (16 total)

  • State v. Smith, 573 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 1990)
    …ictim is relevant to show, as asserted here, the reasonableness of the defendant’s apprehension to support a self-defense claim. §§ 90.-404(1)(b)(1), .405(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). E.g., Palm v. State, 135 Fla. 258, 184 So. 881 (1938); Sanchez v. State, 445 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Smith v. State, 410 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 419 So. 2d 1200 (Fla.1982); Williams v. State, 252 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 255 So. 2d 682 (Fla.1971). Testimony that other people knew of specific act…
  • Lozano v. State, 584 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …ior arrests and bad acts is not admissible where, as here, a defendant has no knowledge of the matters sought to be introduced. See Mozqueda v. State, 541 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Taylor v. State, 513 So. 2d at 1372; see also Sanchez v. State, 445 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We find no error because we find no relevance between Blanchard’s possession of marijuana and Lozano’s apprehension or compulsion to act in self-defense. We also find that Lloyd’s prior arrests and convictions, and evidence rela…
  • Grace v. State, 832 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
    …easonably suggest the need for self-defense. See Hedges v. State, 667 So. 2d 420, 423 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding that the defendant’s testimony that the victim threatened to beat her and then struck her constituted an overt act); Sanchez v. State, 445 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (holding that the defendant’s testimony that the victim threatened to kill him and started walking toward the victim’s vehicle met the overt act requirement). Because Grace offered evidence of an overt act by the victim that wo…

Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw