THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
T. LAMAR HAZEN, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the referee's report and recommended disciplinary penalty for attorney misconduct.
The Florida Bar filed an eight-count complaint against Hazen for violating Bar rules. A referee found Hazen guilty of three counts and recommended a s…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disciplinary Rule 9-102(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar filed an eight-count complaint against Hazen, charging him with violating Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(4) and DR 9-102(A). The referee appointed by this Court held a hearing, at which time the bar dismissed three of the counts. The referee recommends that Hazen be found not guilty of two of the counts and that he be found guilty of the remaining three counts. As to discipline, the referee recommends that Hazen be suspended for six months from the date of his initial temporary suspension (February 15, 1982)* and thereafter until he proves his rehabilitation pursuant to rule 11.10(3).
Neither Hazen nor the bar has petitioned for review of the referee’s report and recommendations. We have examined the record and adopt both the report and the recommended penalty. Costs in the amount of $3,883.57 are hereby taxed against Hazen.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. *
The period of suspension, therefore, has already expired. We note, however, that the temporary suspension has never been lifted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
State v. Jackson, 478 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1985)…arvey v. State, 450 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The Fourth District Court of Appeal receded from its Harvey decision in Boynton v. State, 473 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). . We have consistently enforced similar provisions. See Cave v. State, 445 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1984) (remanding to trial court for written findings for imposition of death penalty as required by § 921.141(3)1, Fla.Stat. (1981)); State v. Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla.1984) (requiring the decision to impose adult sanctions on a juvenile to…
-
Linroy Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 2002)…e's requirements and prepared written, specific findings of fact with regard to the aggravating circumstances, this Court would either require the court to supplement the record with the specific findings that are required, see, e.g., Cave v. State, 445 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1984), or possibly, depending on the facts of the case, we would vacate the sentence and remand for the imposition of a life sentence. See, e.g., Van Royal v. State, 497 So. 2d 625, 628 (Fla.1986); see also Christopher v. State, 583 So. 2d 642,…
-
Boynton v. State, 473 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…onment in accordance with s.775.082. It is true that our supreme court in 1976 held that dictation into the record when transcribed met the requirements of the statute. Thompson v. State, 328 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1976). In 1984, however, in Cave v. State, 445 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1984), the court stated: It must be stressed that the trial judge did dictate his findings in support of the sentence of death into the record at the time of sentencing. We have previously held that “[sjuch dictation, when transcribed, becomes…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence