UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
FRED JOSEPH WALDENFELS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
FRED JOSEPH WALDENFELS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
422 F.2d 1323
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970)
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, found guilty of smuggling seventeen pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, raises but one ground of alleged error on this appeal— namely: that the Assistant United States Attorney used prejudicial and inflammatory arguments to the jury. No objection was made to any of the twelve matters now charged to constitute error. Under the court’s cautionary instructions to the jury, we hold there was no error. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Hayden, 445 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1971)
-
United States v. FOX, 454 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1971)
-
United States v. Dobie, 444 F.2d 417 (4th Cir. 1971)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence