HAROLD G. SODERLING AND ERIC F. WILKINSON, APPELLANTS,
v.
KAL W. LINES, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR HARRIS AIRMOTIVE, INC., A CORPORATION, BANKRUPT, APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1970-01-29
No. 22959
Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
423 F.2d 719 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The district court's order upholding the bankruptcy referee's order is affirmed because the state court lacked jurisdiction over the bankrupt's assets.


Facts & Procedural History

A California state court determined a bankrupt was indebted to appellants and impressed a lien on the bankrupt's assets. However, by the time the judg…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The district court’s order upholding the order of the federal bankruptcy referee is affirmed. A California state court determined that the bankrupt was indebted to the appellants Soderling, et al., to the extent of about $36,000.00. The state court went on to adjudicate that the sum should be impressed as a lien on the assets of the bankrupt in the hands of the trustee.

We need not decide what the situation would be if the state court had exclusive custody of some assets of the bankrupt. Here it had none. In our situation, the state court had jurisdiction to determine a rescission of certain contracts and to adjudge an amount due. But it had no jurisdiction over the assets. Guiding principles can be found in U. S. F. & G. Co. v. Bray, 225 U.S. 205, 32 S.Ct. 620, 56 L.Ed. 1055.

Rescission was necessary to create a lien on the assets. By the time judgment for rescission was entered, the assets were in the hands of the federal court, leaving the federal court the only one with jurisdiction to adjudge priorities and liens against assets. If the purported lien had been established before the bankruptcy, we would have a different case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw