THOMAS H. HOPKINS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
THOMAS H. HOPKINS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
423 F.2d 1206
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this case the district court denied the appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 without making findings of fact and conclusions of law, as is required by the provisions of Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P. See Welch v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1968, 400 F. 2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5th Cir. 1968, 392 F. 2d 74. Therefore the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings and conclusions.
Remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hart v. United States, 565 F.2d 360 (5th Cir. 1978)
-
Miller v. Henderson, 435 F.2d 688 (5th Cir. 1970)
Authorities Cited
- Clemmon D. Waters v. Beto, 392 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Welch v. Beto, 400 F.2d 582 (5th Cir. 1968)