CLEVELAND YANCY JERNIGAN, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
LAY BARGE DELTA FIVE AND AQUATIC CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Calendar Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
We adopt as the opinion of this court the well reasoned opinion of the district court.1 Jernigan v. Lay Barge Delta Five, 296 F.Supp. 127 (S.D.Tex.1969).2
Affirmed.
. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F. 2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F. 2d 526, Part I.
. Underwater Services, Inc. v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc., 376 F. 2d 852 (5th Cir. 1967), is incorrectly cited as appearing at 376 F. 2d 832, in the opinion of the district court as reported.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (40 total)
-
Retail, Wholesale & Dep't Stoke Union, Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 466 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
-
Soule Glass & Glazing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tahoe Nugget, Inc., 584 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 40 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Murphy v. Houma Well Serv., 409 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Huth v. S. Pac. Co., 417 F.2d 526 (5th Cir. 1969)
- McFARLAND v. Wilson, 376 F.2d 852 (9th Cir. 1967)
- Underwater Servs., Inc. v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc., 376 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Krause v. Featherston, 376 F.2d 832 (1st Cir. 1967)