UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JOHNNY RAY SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1970-04-07
No. 27096
Before RIVES, BELL and DYER, Circuit Judges.
423 F.2d 1357 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the jury charge on the insanity defense was insufficient and required reversal. However, other assignments of error, including the denial of acquittal, admissibility of confession, and fingerprint evidence, were without merit.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of unlawful interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle. A defense of insanity was raised, and the jury was charged on…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of unlawful interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312.

One of the defenses asserted was insanity at the time of the commission of the offense. We find that the evidence was sufficient to require submission of the issue to the jury. It was submitted but the charge given did not comport with the requirements of Blake v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 407 F. 2d 908, that case not having been decided at the time. Blake was made applicable to cases then on appeal and thus reversal for a new trial is dictated. See United States v. Pedrero, 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F. 2d 1235; United States v. Tsoi Kwan Sang, 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F. 2d 306; Davis v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 413 F. 2d 1226; United States v. Meadows, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F. 2d 860; United States v. Bryan, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F. 2d 841; United States v. Davis, 5 Cir., 1969, 411 F. 2d 570; United States v. Hankins, 5 Cir., 1969, 410 F. 2d 753; Theriault v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 1313; Hodges v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 845; United States v. Lepiscopo, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F. 2d 843; Hausmann v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 407 F. 2d 1339.

There are several additional assignments of error. Decision will be pretermitted as to those not likely to recur on a subsequent trial.

As to remaining assignments of error, six will be finally resolved. The court did not err in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal. It was proper to admit the confession of defendant. The exceptions to the jury charge are without merit. The testimony of the fingerprint expert was ad missible from the standpoint of his qualifications being established and also from the standpoint of comparative fingerprints.

We pretermit the questions arising from the alleged improper search of the impounded vehicle. There was no objection to the fingerprint evidence which was discovered as a result of the search and therefore the record was not developed to the extent that a rational decision can be made on the question. Compare United States v. Adams, 5 Cir., 1970, 428 F. 2d 175, on the search of an impounded vehicle. The identification number taken from the vehicle was admissible. United States v. Johnson, 5 Cir., 1969, 413 F. 2d 1396.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited (15 total)

View all 15 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw