UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
MICHAEL BENJAMIN MAESTRI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
MICHAEL BENJAMIN MAESTRI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
424 F.2d 1066
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We are unable to distinguish hashish, here under scrutiny, and commonplace marihuana. The 21 U.S.C. § 176a presumption is invalid as to both. Consequently, the judgment of the lower court is set aside and the cause remanded for proceedings in conformity with Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969) and United States v. Scott, 425 F. 2d 55 (9th Cir., March 6, 1970).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Piercefield, 437 F.2d 1188 (5th Cir. 1971)
Authorities Cited
- Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 (U.S. 1969)
- United States v. Scott, 425 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1970)