THOMAS A. PROVENCE, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

LOUIS L. WAINWRIGHT, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Tessan Swartz v. McDONALD'S Corp., 788 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 2001)
  …traveling employee exception when an employee is merely traveling to or from work. See § 440.092(4), Fla. Stat. (1995). . Swartz contends that Advanced Diagnostics v. Walsh, 437 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), Standard Distribution Co. v. Johnson, 445 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), and Poinciana Village Construction Corp. v. Gallarano, 424 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), all permit exceptions to the “going and coming” rule for missions completed on behalf of the employer without requiring suddenness and ir…
• Tessann Swartz v. McDONALD'S Corp. & Corporate Sys., 726 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …to the job fair. That is what she was doing when the accident occurred on 1-4 at the 1-75 interchange, well before she reached Orlando and the point at which she would have left the highway to go home. See generally Standard Distrib. Co. v. Johnson, 445 So. 2d 663, 664 (Fla 1st DCA 1984) (holding that, where an employee intends to deviate from his route, he remains within the course and scope of employment until a deviation actually occurs); El Viejo Arco Iris, Inc. v. Luaces, 395 So. 2d 225, 226 (Fla. 1st DC…
• McCORMICK v. State of Florida-Auditor General/Division OF Risk Mgmt., 772 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
  …the Auditor General’s Tampa office. We conclude that during the trip home, for which she was compensated, claimant was a traveling employee entitled to the statutory exception to the going and coming rule. See Standard Distribution Co. v. Johnson, 445 So. 2d 663, 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (“Johnson was a traveling employee who was paid for the use of his car on his employer’s business. These are exceptions to the going-and-eoming rule, thus, his accident and injury while enroute home were covered by the worke…