ORLANDO HENRY AND RICARDO FEBLES, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-02-21
Nos. 83-1456, 83-1513
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
445 So. 2d 669 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdicts and that the trial court did not err in denying a requested jury instruction.


Facts & Procedural History

The co-defendants were convicted of unlawful possession of cannabis after a jury trial. They were sentenced to probation with a jail term.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals are from the co-defendants’ convictions pursuant to a jury verdict finding them guilty on the charge of unlawful possession of cannabis. Each of the co-defendants was placed on probation for a period of five years with a special condition that he serve 364 days in the Dade County jail.

It is contended on appeal that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury verdicts and that the trial court erred in its denial of a requested instruction to the jury. We find these contentions to be without merit.

The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the verdicts are supported by the evidence and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by the defendants do not under the law constitute harmful error. See: Cordle v. State, 435 So. 2d 902, 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Turner v. State, 423 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Scott v. State, 396 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Lacy v. State, 387 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Pittman v. State, 360 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Accordingly, the judgments and sentences appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw