NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES, INC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's findings were supported by substantial evidence, making a bargaining order necessary and appropriate.
The National Labor Relations Board found the respondent employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by threatening, interrogating, and promising bene…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse National Labor Relations Act Section 8(A)(1) Violations cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The initial decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board in this case is reported at 170 N.L.R.B. No. 128. The application for enforcement was remanded by this Court on motion of the Board for reconsideration in light of N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company, Inc., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). Thereafter, the Board issued its supplemental decision and order which is reported at 178 N.L. R.B. No. 112. This present proceeding is for enforcement.
The Board found that the respondent threatened and interrogated its employees, as well as promised and granted them benefits, in order to dissipate pro-union sentiment in violation of Section 8(a) (1) of the Act. It also found that the Union obtained valid authorization cards from a majority of respondent’s employees and that the respondent’s subsequent coercive conduct destroyed this majority and precluded any likelihood of a fair election.
These findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. A bargaining order was therefore necessary and appropriate. N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Company, Inc., supra.
Enforcement granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mach. Tool & Gear, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 652 F.2d 596 (6th Cir. 1980)
Authorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1969)