RICHARD RINDLEY, A/K/A DICK RINDLEY, APPELLANT,

v.

GORY ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …964, 87 S.Ct. 390, 17 L.Ed.2d 310 (1966); see Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So. 2d 11, 12 (Fla. 1974), or “if susceptible of reasonable proof, may not compensate for all aspects of such a violation.” Capraro v. Lanier Business Products, Inc., 445 So. 2d 719, 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (quoting Silvers, 403 So. 2d at 1137), approved, 466 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985). A temporary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy which should be sparingly granted. Rollins Protective Services Co. v. Lammons, 472 So…
• Hapney v. Cent. Garage, Inc., 579 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …and burden of proof, not the validity of the underlying contract. Although Capraro contested the covenant’s enforceability on grounds of estoppel, the issue of a protecti-ble interest was not presented. See Capraro v. Lanier Business Products, Inc., 445 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), decision approved by Capraro v. Lanier Business Prods., Inc., 466 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985). Likewise, Sarasota Beverage Co. relates solely to the court’s authority to limit or reject the enforcement of a valid contract on equitable…
• Capraro v. Lanier Bus. Prods., Inc., 466 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1985)
  …SHAW, Justice. We review Capraro v. Lanier Business Products, Inc., 445 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), because of express and direct conflict with Uni-Chem Corp. v. Maret, 338 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1976). We [*213] have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The facts of the case are set forth fully in the district cour…

Authorities Cited

• King v. Ins. Co. OF N. Am. & D.L. Small Corp., 426 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)