AIRLINE MAINTENANCE LODGE 702, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
DONALD L. LOUDERMILK, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT
AIRLINE MAINTENANCE LODGE 702, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES,
DONALD L. LOUDERMILK, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT
426 F.2d 802
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Because of the inadequacy of the briefs of both parties growing out of the fact that the issue was not considered adequately by the District Court, the judgment is vacated and remanded for the District Court to consider and then make appropriate findings and conclusions regarding the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court, the propriety and basis for removal from the State Court, the propriety of denial of the motion to remand, and related matters going to Federal Court jurisdiction and removal. A new judgment as appropriate shall then be entered. In calling the Court’s attention to these possibly relevant materials, we intimate in no way any prejudgment. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1441, 1331(a), 1337; International Ass’n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc., 1963, 372 U.S. 682, 83 S.Ct. 956, 10 L.Ed.2d 67; Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 1968, 390 U.S. 557, 88 S.Ct. 1235, 20 L.Ed.2d 126; Mungin v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F. 2d 1169; Clinton v. Hueston, 5 Cir., 1962, 308 F. 2d 908.
Judgment vacated.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. Best BUY Co., Inc., 269 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 2001)
-
Airline Maint. Lodge 702 v. Loudermilk, 444 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1971)
Authorities Cited
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge NO. 735, 390 U.S. 557 (U.S. 1968)
- Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists, Afl-Cio v. Cent. Airlines, Inc., 372 U.S. 682 (U.S. 1963)
- Nehemiah Mungin v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 416 F.2d 1169 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Clinton v. Hueston, 308 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1962)