BERNICE R. SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT H. FINCH, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, AND LENA M. SMITH, APPELLEES
BERNICE R. SMITH, APPELLANT,
ROBERT H. FINCH, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, AND LENA M. SMITH, APPELLEES
426 F.2d 814
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In this appeal we find oral argument unnecessary and summarily affirm the judgment of the district court. The Secretary’s finding that the claimant was not the widow of the deceased, and, therefore, not entitled to Social Security Widows benefits, is amply supported by the record.1 Cain v. Secretary, 377 F. 2d 55 (4 Cir. 1967).
Affirmed.
. Although it would appear that the finding that the adverse party Lena Smith is the widow of Melvin Smith is equally well supported, that issue is not before us. Since the claimant must establish her own eligibility for benefits, it is irrelevant whether she can show, on grounds independent of those on which she claims eligibility, the ineligibility of another party.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Steele v. Elliot Richardson, 472 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- Cain v. Secretary of Health, 377 F.2d 55 (4th Cir. 1967)