UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
WILLIAM WALTER WANGER, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
WILLIAM WALTER WANGER, APPELLANT
426 F.2d 1360
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of conviction is vacated, and the cause is remanded for a new trial. Wade v. United States, 426 F. 2d 64 (9th Cir. Mar. 30, 1970).
The appellant did not forfeit his rights under Wade by failing to object to jury instructions which applied the law as it was firmly established prior to Wade, nor should he be penalized for his attorney’s not having requested jury instructions which, at the time of his trial, would have been inconsistent with the law as it then existed. Compare United States v. Scott, 425 F. 2d 55 (9th Cir. Mar. 6, 1970).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The People OF the Territory OF Guam v. Jae Hung Yang, 850 F.2d 507 (9th Cir. 1988)
-
United States v. Porter, 431 F.2d 7 (9th Cir. 1970)
-
Robinson v. Heilman, 563 F.2d 1304 (9th Cir. 1977)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wade v. United States, 426 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Scott, 425 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1970)