UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
SAMUEL L. BROYLES, APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1970-06-08
No. 24331
427 F.2d 358 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the delinquency classification lacked statutory authority and accelerated induction affected substantial rights.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant applied for conscientious objector status, but his draft board declared him delinquent and ordered induction. The delinquency classification…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Samuel L. Broyles appeals from his conviction for refusing to submit to induction in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462.

On April 15, 1968, Broyles submitted an application to his draft board to be classified as a conscientious objector. On July 29, 1968, while this application was pending, the draft board received a letter from him in which he criticized the Selective Service System and enclosed his registration certificate and classification card. On the following day, the state director determined Broyles to be “delinquent.”

On August 8, 1968, a formal delinquency notice was sent to Broyles. On the same day his conscientious objector claim was rejected because he did “ * * not evidence sincerity in religious training and belief.” On September 16, 1968, he was ordered to report for induction.

There is no statutory authority for a delinquency classification. Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295, 90 S.Ct. 506, 24 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970). It must be assumed, absent a showing to the contrary, that the board followed the regulatory command (32 C.F.R. § 1642.13) and accelerated Broyles’ induction. This, in turn, affected his substantial rights. United States v. Thomas, 422 F. 2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1970); followed in United States v. Stow, 427 F. 2d 891 (9th Cir. 1970).

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw