ROBERTO FARRA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-02-28
No. 83-491
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
445 So. 2d 1093 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Ferguson v. State, 417 So. 2d 639 (Fla.1982); Blair v. State, 406 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.1981); Baxter v. State, 375 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Becker v. Becker, 778 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
    …, 552 So. 2d 323, 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). However, this issue pertaining to the wife’s dissolution petition is being raised for the first time on appeal and is not subject to review by this Court. See Wilkerson, 675 So. 2d at 952; Garcia v. Garcia, 445 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984)(holding it could not assess appellant’s argument concerning a pleading deficiency because the argument was not raised at the trial court level). [*440] Finally, the husband argues the trial court erred by authorizing the wife’s a…
  • Jacoby v. Jacoby, 458 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …[*1145] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Conner v. Conner, 439 So. 2d 887 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Garcia v. Garcia, 445 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw