STEEL FABRICATORS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We do not believe the appellant has demonstrated error in the trial court’s entry of summary judgment essentially predicated upon a previously entered arbitration award and judgment entered thereon which specifically denied a claim that appellant now contends was really granted by the arbitrators but used as a setoff against claims made against the appellant in the arbitration proceedings. We have been cited no authority that would allow a trial court in a collateral proceeding to impeach findings of an arbitration panel that have been subsequently judicially approved.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chavous v. State, 597 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…Davis v. State, 562 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). It is well settled that hearsay is admissible in probation revocation proceedings, but cannot be the sole basis for revocation. Hogan v. State, 583 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Meyer v. State, 445 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Terry v. State, 406 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Tuff v. State, 338 So. 2d 1335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). In the case sub judice, there was no evidence of appellant’s probation violation other than the urinalysis report. Thus, there…
-
Esbenshade v. State, 494 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…ficient evidence to justify the revocation of probation, and the trial court’s oral pronouncements to that effect were not erroneous. However, the order erroneously fails to recite the conditions of probation which were violated. See Meyer v. State, 445 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Dunlap v. State, 405 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Accordingly, we remand for correction of the order but otherwise affirm. RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.…
-
Loring v. State, 499 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…Center. The court revoked the defendant’s probation and the evidence supports revocation based on violation of that condition. The trial judge, however, failed to specify the condition or conditions on which he based revocation. See Meyer v. State, 445 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). There is no merit to the defendant’s remaining point on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm revocation of the defendant’s probation and remand with directions to the trial court to properly inscribe the condition or conditions on wh…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence