MILLMASTER INTERNATIONAL INC., MILLMASTER INTERNATIONAL CORP., APPELLANTS,
v.
THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court modified its prior opinion to address the issue of foreign and export value, but denied the petition for rehearing and request for remand.
Appellee petitioned for rehearing, arguing the court failed to address whether appellants proved the nonexistence of foreign and export value for merc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Export Value cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Appellee petitions for rehearing on the ground that the decision rendered by this court on June 11, 1970, 427 F. 2d 811, failed to dispose of an issue involved in this case, namely whether appellants had proved the nonexistence of both foreign and export value for the merchandise involved or similar merchandise. Appellee also requests an order remanding the case to Appellate Term for disposition of the issue.
The trial judge found that appellants had negated the existence of foreign and export value. The Appellate Term decision affirmed this finding by the following statement: “No error was committed by the trial court in the findings of fact and conclusions of law it reached on the record presented to it. Such findings of fact and conclusions of law are incorporated herein by reference.”
The finding in question was supported by evidence and we cannot say that the finding was clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence. We mention that the United States had full opportunity to argue this point when the case was heard by this court.
Our-opinion is modified to the extent indicated herein. The petition for rehearing and the request for remand are denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Evcco Leasing Corp. v. ACE Trucking Co., 828 F.2d 188 (3d Cir. 1987)
Authorities Cited
- Millmaster Int'l Inc. v. The United States, 427 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1970)