DEXTER D. COFFIN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
v.
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, A FOREIGN STOCK INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the aviation insurance policy was not ambiguous regarding passenger coverage and affirmed the dismissal.
Plaintiff's liability insurance carrier denied coverage and refused to defend him in an action involving injury and death to a third person. The plain…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Wrongful Denial Of Coverage cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from the pretrial dismissal of Count I of a complaint.1 The case was tried on Count II with judgment for defendant and there is no appeal from that judgment. In Count I plaintiff alleged that his liability insurance carrier wrongfully denied coverage and wrongfully refused to defend him in an action involving injury and death to a third person in connection with plaintiff’s operation of a Cessna Aircraft.
Plaintiff contended that the aviation policy in question was ambiguous as to liability coverage including coverage for injury and death to the third person. Postulating ambiguity, plaintiff contended that the policy should be construed in his favor. The district court found that the third person was a passenger, that the policy did not afford passenger coverage, and that there was no ambiguity with respect to passenger coverage. We agree and it is thus unnecessary to reach the cross-appeal filed by defendant.
Affirmed.
. We dispose of this case on the briefs and record, without oral argument, as provided by our Local Rule 18.