NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES J. MCLAUGHLIN, PATRICK MCLAUGHLIN, DANNY RAY MEADOR, HARRY E. HOSKINS, HOWARD HOSKINS, EVA HOSKINS, GLENN ARLAN CHAPMAN, GEORGE HARRY CHAPMAN, JOSEPH R. DICKERSON AND CHARLES EDWARD HOGAN, APPELLANTS
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE,
JAMES J. MCLAUGHLIN, PATRICK MCLAUGHLIN, DANNY RAY MEADOR, HARRY E. HOSKINS, HOWARD HOSKINS, EVA HOSKINS, GLENN ARLAN CHAPMAN, GEORGE HARRY CHAPMAN, JOSEPH R. DICKERSON AND CHARLES EDWARD HOGAN, APPELLANTS
429 F.2d 1317
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The question of permission to drive an automobile and deviation from the scope of permission was submitted to the jury under a fair charge. The jury answered that Danny Ray Meador was driving the vehicle with the permission of the owner under the omnibus clause of the owner’s insurance clause.
We think the question was one upon which reasonable men could differ, and was within the province of the jury. It follows, therefore, that the decision of the district judge to enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict was erroneous.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Indira Gairola v. Commonwealth OF Va. Dep't OF Gen. Servs., 753 F.2d 1281 (4th Cir. 1985)
-
Wheatley v. Elbert Gladden, 660 F.2d 1024 (4th Cir. 1981)
-
Fed. Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Reeves, 816 F.2d 130 (4th Cir. 1987)