SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION, INC. AND SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., PETITIONERS,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RESPONDENTS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THEATRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST
SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION, INC. AND SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION OF CALIFORNIA, INC., PETITIONERS,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RESPONDENTS, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THEATRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST
430 F.2d 957
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970)
Caution
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Petitioner asks review of a discovery order. There is no showing of irreparable injury. Cf. Hartley Pen Co. v. United States District Court, 287 F. 2d 324 (9th Cir. 1961).
Petition denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The United States v. Turtle Mountain Band OF Chippewa Indians, 612 F.2d 517 (Ct. Cl. 1979)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Monroe Auto Equip. Co., 470 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
This That & THE Other Gift & Tobacco, Inc. v. Cobb Cnty., 439 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2006)
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bartley PEN Co. v. United States Dist. Court for the S. Dist. OF Cal., 287 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1961)