UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
WILLIAM WRIGHT, APPELLANT

8th Cir. | 1970-09-29
No. 20109
431 F.2d 726 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the jury instruction regarding possession of a recently stolen vehicle is a permissible inference for interstate transportation.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendant was convicted of transporting a stolen vehicle across state lines. He was apprehended driving the stolen car and falsely claimed ownership.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Wright has been convicted of interstate transportation of a motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312.

The evidence showed that the vehicle, a 1968 Cadillac, was on a used-car parking lot in Chicago, Illinois, on Saturday, September 27, 1969. It was discovered missing the following Monday morning, September 29, 1969. Defendant was apprehended driving it in St. Louis, Missouri, on October 1, 1969. He was without motor vehicle registration or driver’s license. At the time of his arrest he falsely represented himself to be the owner of the car. At trial his subsequent alibi was effectively impeached. The evidence is clearly sufficient to sustain the conviction. Cf. Burke v. United States, 388 F. 2d 286 (8 Cir. 1968).

On appeal error is urged as to the court’s instruction that possession of a recently stolen automobile, if not satisfactorily explained, is a circumstance from which the jury may reasonably draw the inference of knowingly transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce. This standard instruction has drawn continued approval without exception from this court. See Burke v. United States, supra.

Judgment affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw