HIGHLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
MILDRED MCCUTCHEN, RESPONDENT
HIGHLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER,
MILDRED MCCUTCHEN, RESPONDENT
446 So. 2d 1073
Florida Supreme Court (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Approved. U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould, 437 So. 2d 1061 (Fla.1983). See also Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Wackenhut Corp., 442 So. 2d 192 (Fla.1983).
It is so ordered.
ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Highlands Ins. Co. v. McCUTCHEN, 486 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…on of the facts and issues may be found in the prior opinions of Ten Associates v. McCutchen, 398 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 411 So. 2d 384 (Fla.1981), and McCutchen v. Highlands Insurance Co., 424 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), approved, 446 So. 2d 1073 (Fla.1984). We reverse and remand upon the following briefly stated analysis. First, the second appeal established that: where the claim for punitive damages is based on the wanton and willful misconduct of an employee and the employer is also at…
Authorities Cited
- U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould, 437 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1983)
- AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. The Wackenhut Corp., 442 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 1983)