DON VICTOR HARBOLT, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
NOAH L. ALLDREDGE, WARDEN, APPELLEE

10th Cir. | 1970-10-22
No. 295-70
Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KERR, District Judge.
432 F.2d 441 United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1970)
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon docketing, this case was assigned to the summary calendar in view of the unsubstantial questions involved and Harbolt was given an opportunity to address the underlying merits and oppose summary action, which he has done.

A thorough review of the files and records in this case, along with the papers submitted by Harbolt, convinces us that the judgment of the district court is correct and that there is no necessity for further argument.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in 311 F.Supp. 688 (W.D.Okl. 1970).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw