FLORIDA REINVESTMENT CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

SITE CONTRACTING, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dusty Ray Spencer v. State, 842 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2003)
  …ularly read or viewed. The test for determining juror competency is whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render a verdict solely on. the evidence. presented and the instructions on the law given by the court. See Lusk v. State, 446 So. 2d 1088, 1041 (Fla.1984). Our review of the record indicates that each of the jurors in question met this standard. Further, the record shows that either counsel or the court adequately questioned the jurors regarding any possible bias. Thus, we agree with…
• Gorham v. State, 988 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …remand for de novo resentencing. Unless the state can show the requisite necessity, Gorham is entitled to be sentenced by the same judge that heard the evidence and initially imposed sentence in this case. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700; Lester v. State, 446 So. 2d 1088, 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (noting that except in emergency situations rule contemplates that sentence be imposed by trial judge). SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur. . Gorham’s motion was denied following this court’s remand in Gorham v.…
• Cowart v. State, 860 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …preside. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.700(c); Lawley v. State, 377 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (“convenience does not justify a practice that departs from the well recognized assumption that sentencing is an individualized procedure”); Lester v. State, 446 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (applying rule 3.700(c) in context of revocation of probation proceeding); Lusskin v. State, 717 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (apply [*1043] ing rule 3.700(c) in context of motion to mitigate sentence); Clemons v. State, 816 So…