STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
BRUCE JOSEPH SCHIHL, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1983-06-29
No. 83-220
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
447 So. 2d 227 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Riley v. State, 448 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In response to appellant’s request, we join with the Third District Court of Appeal and certify to the Supreme Court of Florida, as provided for in Article V, Section 3(b)(4) of the Constitution of Florida, the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER IT IS UNLAWFUL [UNDER THE FEDERAL OR FLORIDA CONSTITUTION OR FLORIDA STATUTORY LAW] FOR THE POLICE, IN AN OTHERWISE LAWFUL MANNER, TO ENTER PRIVATE PREMISES WHICH THEY ARE AUTHORIZED TO SEARCH PURSUANT TO A VALID AND PREVIOUSLY ISSUED SEARCH WARRANT, WHEN THE ENTERING OFFICERS DO NOT PHYSICALLY HAVE THE SEARCH WARRANT IN HAND UPON ENTRY, BUT DO RECEIVE THE WARRANT SHORTLY THEREAFTER AND DULY EXECUTE IT.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Riley, 462 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1984)
    …OVERTON, Justice. These consolidated cases are before us on petitions to review decisions of the district courts of appeal reported as Riley v. State, 448 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and State v. Schihl, 447 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), in which the following question was certified as being of great public importance: 1 Whether it is unlawful [under the federal or Florida constitution or Florida statutory law] for the police, in an otherwise lawful manner, to…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw