UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
SAMUEL F. MANARITE, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
SAMUEL F. MANARITE, APPELLANT
434 F.2d 1069
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1970)
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We have affirmed in open court because we believe appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of one of the statutes under which he was convicted, 18 U.S.C. § 894, forbidding “the use of any extortionate means * * * to collect or attempt to collect any extension of credit,” is foreclosed by our recent decisions in United States v. De Stefano, 2 Cir., 429 F. 2d 344 (1970), and United States v. Perez, 2 Cir., 426 F. 2d 1073, cert. granted, 400 U.S. 915, 91 S.Ct. 175, 27 L.Ed.2d 154 (1970). Moreover, we did not see any merit to his other contentions.
Concurrence
HAYS, Circuit Judge
(concurring):
Having dissented in United States v. Perez, I consider myself bound by the result in that case and therefore concur in the present opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160 (2d Cir. 1975)
-
Royal Typewriter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 533 F.2d 1030 (8th Cir. 1976)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc., 465 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1972)
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Alcides Perez, 426 F.2d 1073 (2d Cir. 1970)
- United States v. DeSTAFANO, 429 F.2d 344 (2d Cir. 1970)
- Grove Press, Inc. v. Flask, 400 U.S. 915 (U.S. 1970)
- Luttrell v. United States, 400 U.S. 915 (U.S. 1970)