JACKSONVILLE, TAMPA & KEY WEST RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
FREDERICK A. GARRISON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a judgment for the killing of a Jersey cow, finding that the awarded damages of $400 were excessive and unsupported by the evidence, which established the cow's market value at $300-$350.
The judgment was excessive and not supported by the evidence. The cow's market value was established at $300-$350 by the testimony, yet the judgment was for $400, warranting reversal and a new trial.
“The only witnesses who testified in reference to the animal killed, were the plaintiff and H. Chancey. The latter was asked if he knew the value of the cow in question, in the general market of Putnam county, and answered that "she would be worth $300."”
Establishes the evidence presented on the cow's market value
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGarrison sued the Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Company for negligently killing his Jersey cow in March 1887. The case was referred to a refe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Excessive Damages cases and more on FLexlaw
Mabry, J. :
The appellee sued the appellant company in the Fifth Judicial Circuit for Putnam county, for the alleged negligent killing of a certain Jersey cow. The pleas were the general issue, and that the defendant company did not own, use or operate any railroad at the place where the cow was alleged to have been killed. The case was referred to a referee, who, after hearing the evidence, rendered a judgment against the company in favor of the plaintiff, Frederick A. Garrison, for four hundred dollars, besides costs of suit, from which judgment an appeal has been taken to this court. The judgment rendered in this case can not be sustained. The only witnesses who testified in reference to the animal killed, were the plaintiff and TI. Chancey. The latter was asked if he knew the value of the cow in question, in the general market of Putnam county, and answered that “she would be worth $300.” He further stated that he knew the cow well, having been employed by the plaintiff to look after his cattle. The plaintiff stated, in answer to a question if he knew the market value of the cow. that “she was worth $350.” This was all the evidence on the subject of value. The judgment was for four hundred dollars, besides costs of suit.
The evidence does not sustain it, and the ground in the motion for a new trial, that the judgment was excessive, was well taken. The cow was killed in March, 1887, before the passage of the act of that year, Chapter 3742, and the suit was instituted m January, 1888. Without passing upon the sufficiency of the evidence in this case to fix liability-on the company, the judgment is reversed for the reason above given.
The order will be that the judgment is reversed, and a new trial awarded.