MICHELE HESS, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS, DON HESS AND CONNIE TIPPETT, AND DON HESS AND CONNIE TIPPETT, INDIVIDUALLY, PETITIONERS,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adequate Remedy cases and more on FLexlaw
[*268] PER CURIAM.
Michele Hess and her parents seek to invoke this court’s original mandamus jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 4(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1980), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100. This action stems from a judgment awarded petitioners in the total amount of $365,-400 plus costs in a negligence action against Dade County. The county satisfied the judgment to the extent authorized by section 768.28(5), Florida Statutes (1981), by making payment of $100,000 to the petitioners. Thereafter the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted chapter 83-393, 1983 Fla.Laws 117, directing payment by the county of an additional sum of $270,-329.95 to satisfy the total judgment. The county refused to pay the additional sum.
A writ of mandamus will be granted only when there is no other adequate remedy available to a petitioner. Shevin ex rel. State v. Public Service Commission, 333 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1976); State ex rel. Long v. Carey, 121 Fla. 515, 164 So. 199 (1935); School Board of Lee County v. Malbon, 341 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Laundry Public Health Committee v. Board of Business Regulation, 235 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). Because there are other adequate remedies available to the petitioner we decline to issue the writ. In so doing we do not reach the merits of the petition, but hold only that the availability of alternative relief precludes resort to the extraordinary writ of mandamus in this court. See Carey.
Petition denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hess v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 467 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 1985)…ALDERMAN, Justice. We review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Hess v. Metropolitan Dade County, 447 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), which expressly and directly conflicts with Fine v. Firestone, 448 So. 2d 984 (Fla.1984). The Third District held that it was precluded from issuing a writ of mandamus in this case. When it made this decision, it did not have th…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Carey, 121 Fla. 515 (Fla. 1935)
- Shevin v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 333 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1976)
- Roper v. State, 341 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- The Laundry Pub. Health Comm. OF Fla. v. Bd. OF Bus. Reg. of the State of Fla., 235 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)