ARTHUR STANLEY KERNS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
CHARLES MCWILLIAMS, THE MOBILE PRESS REGISTER, INC., AND THE UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted and vacated the order allowing it.
Defendants in a libel suit sought interlocutory appeal from an order denying their motions for summary judgment. The appellees were not public officia…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse New York Times Co. V. Sullivan cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Charles McWilliams, The Mobile Press Register, Inc. and the United Press International, Inc., defendants in this libel suit, were granted leave to take an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b) from an order of the District Court denying their motions for summary judgment.
After considering the briefs and oral arguments we conclude that the order allowing the interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted. Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F. 2d 294.
Accordingly, the order heretofore allowing the interlocutory appeal is vacated and the case is remanded for trial on the issues of actual malice defamation and possible damages in accordance with the standards of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 1964, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 even, though the appellees are not public officials, since they were engaged in a matter of public interest and concern. Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 1967, 388 U.S. 130, 152-155, 87 S..Ct. 1975, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094; Time, Inc. v. Ragano, 5 Cir. 1970, 427 F. 2d 219; Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F. 2d 858; Wasserman v. Time, Inc., 1970, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 7, 424 F. 2d 920; Time, Inc. v. McLaney, 5 Cir. 1969, 406 F. 2d 565, cert. denied, 395 U.S. 922, 89 S.Ct. 1776, 23 L.Ed.2d 239.
Vacated and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1964)
- Curtis Publ'g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (U.S. 1967)
- BON AIR Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 426 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Time, Inc. v. Ragano, 427 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Time, Inc. v. McLANEY, 406 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Wasserman v. Time, Inc., 424 F.2d 920 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
- Pepperell Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 395 U.S. 922 (U.S. 1969)
- McLaney v. Time, Inc., 395 U.S. 922 (U.S. 1969)
- Spurlin v. Gen. Motors Corp., 426 F.2d 294 (5th Cir. 1970)