PHILIP I. EMMER AND BARBARA L. EMMER, D/B/A BRANDYWINE ASSOCIATES, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANTS,
v.
TRIFON AND TRUDI DUBOLSKY, APPELLEES
PHILIP I. EMMER AND BARBARA L. EMMER, D/B/A BRANDYWINE ASSOCIATES, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANTS,
TRIFON AND TRUDI DUBOLSKY, APPELLEES
447 So. 2d 393
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.
The Emmers take an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion to dismiss the Dubolsky’s complaint, denying their motion for leave to file an amended answer and overruling their objections to the Dubolsky’s interrogatories.
The appeal is taken pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i) which allows interlocutory appeals from nonfinal orders determining jurisdiction of the person. None of the orders appealed from relate to jurisdiction of the person. The Emmers were properly served and the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction of them.
We dismiss the appeal.
WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Philpot v. City OF Miami, 541 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…articular case indicate that a work search would be a futile gesture, such search may be excused as a predicate for disability benefits. Bill’s Equipment and Rentals v. Teel, 498 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fairchild Industries, Inc. v. Sievers, 447 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Furthermore, where, as in the instant case, a post-traumatic neurosis may contribute to or be the cause of disability, the neurosis is compensable only if there has been an actual physical injury, and the neurosis is the direct…
-
Bill's Equip. & Rentals & U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Teel, 498 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…e actively seek employment. Where an effort to find employment would be a futile and useless gesture, the deputy may excuse claimant from the requirement of a work search as a predicate for disability benefits. Fairchild Industries, Inc. v. Sievers, 447 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We conclude that the deputy did not err in finding claimant unemployable and totally disabled. E/C next contend that the amount of attorney’s fee awarded was excessive. The present value of the benefits obtained for claimant wa…
-
Emilie Alexandre v. Excel Handbags, Inc., 479 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…s to be partially amputated after the delivery of her baby six or seven weeks hence. A work search during that period should have been excused. See Sizemore v. Canaveral Port Authority, 332 So. 2d 23 (Fla.1976); Fairchild Industries Inc. v. Sievers, 447 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We also find no evidence of the duration of claimant’s hospitalization, if any, beyond the date of birth of her child, and would not in any event find such evidence to preclude compensation in the circumstances here, i.e., wher…